I continue to track the development of the new, collaborative office place including the new headquarters of some of the biggest companies in the world. But, there is starting to be increasing backlash against the open office space. I came across the article below in Fortune that details some of the negatives of having an open work space. Certain companies rely on having privacy, and in fact, many employees prefer having a closed space to do their work. Noise, lack of privacy, and crammed offices are just some of the issues that these new collaborative work areas face. As you’ll read in the article, some companies take precautions against such complaints, but are they enough to eliminate private spaces for good?
I will be following these developments to see which companies have had success and which haven’t. In the meantime, consider: Is an open collaborative space right for your company?
P.S. We are beginning the year with some cool additions for you to take advantage of. On the top right, you can now click on our Facebook page (please like us). This is not an ordinary run-of-the-mill boring corporate page. We post our narratives AND other articles that do not make the cut here. I am confident you will like what you see if you are a Facebook activist. If you follow Twitter, you can now follow us. We have a cool aphorism of the week we send out on Mondays and at least two other interesting tweets per week. Google+ is now becoming more user-friendly. We have our page fully operational and easy to use. We spent the last year filling our pages with interesting, cool and informative stuff. Take a look.
The Slow Death of the Private Office
As the per-person square footage in offices continues to shrink, many workers — and managers — are beginning to wonder whether we’ve reached the limit.
By: Katherine Reynolds Lewis
September 23, 2013
FORTUNE — So much for having your own little corner at work. For two decades, companies have been shifting to open workspace designs and eliminating dedicated offices in a twin effort to reduce real estate costs and encourage collaboration between colleagues. But as the per-person square footage of the typical workplace continues to shrink, many workers — and managers — are beginning to wonder whether we’ve reached the limit.
“In open workspaces, it’s hard for people to get their work done if it requires uninterrupted concentration and focus,” says Cali Williams Yost, a flexible workplace strategist and author of Tweak It: Make What Matters to You Happen Every Day. “People who have jobs that require private conversations or uninterrupted thinking really struggle.”
A majority of employers allocate 150 square feet or less per worker, down dramatically from 225 square feet in 2010, according to a recent survey by CoreNet Global, a professional association for corporate real estate managers. Space per person is likely to continue to shrink, with 58% of companies expecting to increase employment in the next year. A whopping 81% of companies surveyed have already adopted an open-space floor plan.
Assigned space is unused 50% of the time, says Richard Kadzis, CoreNet’s vice president for strategic communications. And cutting out that space can benefit a company’s balance sheet.
AT&T (T) eliminated offices and consolidated workspace with savings of $3,000 per office for a total of $550 million per year, according to a General Services Administration report. Nortel’s (NTL) telecommuting program saves $20 million a year in real estate, the equivalent of two 20-story office buildings with 40,000 square feet per floor.
But creating a decent workspace isn’t as simple as tearing out office doors and putting in long rows of benches where employees can connect laptops, or putting in place a hoteling system for people to reserve space on an as-needed basis. Done right, an open floor-plan office will include strategically placed quiet rooms for “heads down” work, huddle rooms for small meetings or impromptu discussions, larger conference rooms, and social areas where all that collaboration and innovation can take place. There should also be access to plants and natural light, whether through windows, skylights or creative use of atriums.
Noise is often the most ignored factor in open design, says Kadzis. Acoustical engineers can do remarkable things with white noise and noise-absorbing materials, but they must be part of the design team. That group should also include executives from technology, environmental sustainability, human resources, and facilities management.
When editor Susan R. Paisner worked for a Washington, D.C. trade association, only 10 directors had dedicated offices, and the remaining 80 staffers shared one big open space divided into cubicles. “It was difficult for me because I was frequently being told to be quieter,” Paisner recalls. “It was a very frustrating, difficult environment to work in.”
There were a few small conference rooms in the office, but they were often booked. Once, a challenging issue arose, and she wanted to immediately sit down and speak privately with her staff, but they had to check every private space on the floor before finding one that was available.
Employers also need to integrate telecommuting and flexible work programs when they open these new workspaces, so managers and employees can match the type of work that needs to happen with the spaces and times that are available. For instance, someone who needs to concentrate on a large project should be able to shift her hours to come in before the office is noisy or work from home until she’s met her deadline, Yost says. And employees need training to learn to manage where, when, and how they should work.
For anyone thinking that the challenges are greater than the benefits of open workspaces, you’ve got plenty of company. Even some real estate professionals believe that companies are over-building collaborative space at the expense of privacy and focus work — 31% agreed with that statement in CoreNet’s survey. But the cost savings are quite powerful.
“Open workspaces are not going away,” predicts Yost. “Companies are going to take this as far as they can to save the overhead.”